performed. No performer identity, catalogue, reception or era prestige entered the placement. Written at structural altitude throughout per the standing lyrics-out-of-output discipline: routes, tenet ids, rule outcomes and values only.

Visceral: -4. Guarded, cool, self-aware.

Concept: A woman insists the pull between them is physical, calls the risk of a broken heart reason enough to keep it that way, and names the fear underneath.

A first-person address to a new partner setting the terms of the attraction: the narrator classifies what is happening between them as bodily and ordinary, and the recurring section presses a pair of rhetorical questions that treat the organ of attachment as a liability. A late passage supplies the reason directly, naming self-protection as the motive and fear as the state, after which the recurring section returns unchanged and closes the sheet. Posture: setting terms that keep the attachment at the body -> setting terms that keep the attachment at the body.

honoured. No verbatim reproduction and no close line-level paraphrase anywhere in this file; findings are stated as the lyrical MOVE at structural altitude, per the copyright-filter discipline in the backfill process SOP. Rung-2 abstraction from the first attempt: the recurring section is most of the sheet and repeats whole.

Route: static_portrait The sheet is a portrait of a defended stance held from the first line to the last, and the ego axis governs it at its own soft level. internal_work was the live alternative and is set aside: the late passage does supply real self-examination, but the recurring section returns after it unchanged, so the route's transformation check fails on the inward-subjunctive and aesthetic-markers sub-tests and the Posture line records one stance at both ends; the finding is the same either way and the portrait route describes the dominant arc more honestly. negative_payload was tested and declined, which is the consequential call on this song and is set out under the ego axis below. encouragement, witness_critique, collective_stance and doctrinal do not open. THE LINE (static_portrait): the route's ratification test asks whether the stasis is claimed as identity, as home, design or kingdom. It is not. The stance is stated as a precaution taken against a named risk, and the late passage attributes it to fear rather than to who the narrator is, so the read stays on the Decent side of that line.

Ego axis. Orange-04 is the tenet in question and it fires SOFT. The recurring section frames the attachment faculty as a liability and argues for keeping the involvement at the body, which is the shape of bypassing. Three things hold it soft. The narrator reports her own reactions plainly throughout rather than reporting an absence of them; the late passage names fear as the state and protection as the motive, so the posture is described from inside rather than recommended; and no numbing agent, no substance and no shutdown appears anywhere. R16 governs the rest and is the reason negative_payload was declined: naming a want to be spared a known injury is not one of the harm-signals that route requires, and no ego-flex, appraisal, objectified body, celebrated intoxication or targeted contempt can be quoted from any line. Orange-08 was tested against the physical-terms framing and declines, the partner being addressed directly, credited with an effect on her, and never inventoried. Orange-10 declines: the fear is examined in the late passage rather than worn as identity. Orange-11 declines: one risk is named, not a worldview of lack. Pervasiveness is DISCRETE: the artifact is the framing carried by the recurring section, and the verses and the late passage deliver attraction reported honestly and fear named directly, which is a coherent higher song underneath. Ego: -10. Pervasiveness: discrete. Transcendence axis. Blue-06 fires weakly: the late passage exposes the motive behind the posture, and it costs the narrator the argument she has been making. Blue-08 fires weakly on the same passage. Blue-01 declines, the stance being explained rather than questioned. Everything else in blue stays unfired. Green-01, green-03 and green-05 carry the remainder. Transcendence: 10.

Ego sits in the Decent band and transcendence sits in the Decent band, so both neighbour lists run. Orange (ego neighbour): orange-01 does not fire -- no wealth, status or possession as a measure of worth. orange-02 does not fire -- terms are proposed openly, and no control is exercised. orange-03 does not fire -- no wallow; the register is composed. orange-04 FIRES, soft -- the recurring section argues for keeping involvement bodily. orange-05 does not fire -- no superiority claimed over the partner or anyone. orange-06 does not fire -- no self-destructive behaviour framed as strength. orange-07 does not fire -- no blame aimed outward; the motive is her own. orange-08 does not fire -- the partner is addressed and credited, never inventoried. orange-09 does not fire -- no us-versus-them framing anywhere. orange-10 does not fire -- fear is examined, not cultivated as identity. orange-11 does not fire -- one named risk, not a worldview of lack. One fires and it fires soft, so the placement stays in the Decent band on the ego side. Blue (transcendence neighbour): blue-01 does not fire -- the stance is explained rather than questioned. blue-02 does not fire -- nothing owned, no consequence faced. blue-03 does not fire -- the hard truth is stated and the terms stand. blue-04 does not fire -- opening and closing postures match. blue-05 does not fire -- no growth demonstrated. blue-06 FIRES, weakly -- the late passage exposes the motive at a cost. blue-07 does not fire -- no problem she names a role of her own in. blue-08 FIRES, weakly -- genuine self-examination, confined to one passage. blue-09 does not fire -- no perspective earned through the struggle described. blue-10 does not fire -- nothing released; the guard is kept. blue-11 does not fire -- no empathy, forgiveness or humility enacted. Adjacent tier: orange and blue enumerated, 3 fire

The governing axis is the ego axis, which carries the dominant arc at its own soft level; the transcendence read is real and small and does not govern. Anchors chosen by kind: a portrait whose down-signal is a stance toward intimacy rather than an act against anyone.

-28. Its governing condition is a flirtation that centres the physical without malice or possession, which is the same kind of down-signal at issue here, an attitude to closeness rather than an injury done to a person. This song reads FAR WEAKER than the entry: the archetype supplies coded sexual phrasing centring a partner's body, where this sheet keeps the body at a single reported reaction and spends the rest of its lines on terms, questions and a stated fear. The placement sits between zero and -28, much nearer zero.

-24. The Decent-floor entry governs an unprocessed emotional wallow, and this register is composed, with the one passage of feeling delivered as explanation.

-42. Its governing condition is self-deprecation or toxic attachment ratified as identity, and the ratification test was run above and came back clean.

-45 and -48-appraisal. Neither a pervasive coping payload nor an appraisal of a partner as a prize is on the page.

+25-contaminated and +38-reckoning. Both require an Elevated-strength arc, and the transcendence read here is small. Precedents: -28 Center: -6

relative to the placement, pole-agnostic. - Saturation: -1. One rhetorical framing carries the down-signal. - Resolution: +1. The close restates the terms squarely. - Register: +1. The liability formulation is sharper than stock. - Reach: 0. One pair's scale, matching the placement.

Run independent of the placement. The ego axis GOVERNS this read, so the discrete-artifact case does not arise: contamination is the flag for a discrete harm artifact sitting on a read the ego axis does not govern. Scanned in any case for substance promotion, objectification, ego-flex or materialism, casual cruelty, contempt, betrayal or infidelity, and none is present. R5(d) has no epithet to govern. Contamination: none

pure positive description. Subject (a woman), stance (insisting on physical terms), relational frame (a new attachment being negotiated), and the moves (naming a risk, naming the fear). No negation, no lack, no verdict.

self-contained and order-independent. It names one idea, a guarded attachment argued for and explained, and no clause sets one part of the work against another.

"the pull between them is physical" from the terms set in the first verse; "the risk of a broken heart" from the recurring pair of questions; "the fear underneath" from the late passage naming protection and fear. Every concrete noun sources to a line. Summary check: clean

Decent territory, weaker than -28 and much nearer zero, because the dominant arc is a guarded stance toward a new attachment, argued in rhetorical questions and explained from inside as self-protection.

Reconciliation: aligned { "visceral_charge": -4, "route": "static_portrait", "harm": {"value": -10, "pervasive": false}, "transcendence": {"value": 10}, "precedent_refs": ["-28"], "center": -6, "vernier": {"sat": -1, "res": 1, "reg": 1, "reach": 0}, "contaminated": false, "contamination_note": null, "dogma_referenced": false, "dogma_note": null, "charge_summary": "A woman insists the pull between them is physical, calls the risk of a broken heart reason enough to keep it that way, and names the fear underneath.", "confidence": 0.9 }

Decent territory, weaker than -28 and much nearer zero, because the dominant