performed. Writer, release, and all external context set to zero. The track title is the proper name of a real public figure, and a real band is named on the page; per the citation rules neither is reproduced here or in the prose lanes, and both are treated only as shapes.

Visceral: +30. Hard accounting, real principle inside it.

An itemised accounting of a relationship whose love the narrator could not parse, set against a general principle about where a person's sense of home should sit, with the accounting delivered from a position of stated requirements the relationship failed to meet.

Route: internal_work

one failure, two passes. - Inward subjunctive sub-test: FAIL. The refrain is built on a counterfactual construction repeated four times, imagining a different life rather than occupying a changed one. R7 names this form explicitly. The present-tense acceptances sit inside the refrain as qualifiers rather than carrying it. - Outward wish sub-test: PASS. Nothing is asked of the other person and no precondition is placed on him. - Aesthetic-markers sub-test: PASS. The case for height rests on a stated principle and a stated requirement, both substantive, not on the imagery. One failure is a flag weighing against elevation rather than a cap, and it is what holds the placement below where the wisdom content alone would put it.

- witness_critique: tested seriously, since the song names another's conduct at length, and rejected as governing. The naming serves a personal accounting that arrives at the narrator's own standard, rather than exposing a pattern for its own sake. - static_portrait: rejected. A principle is derived and asserted, which is more than a condition described. - negative_payload: R16 finds no quotable signal of the enumerated kinds directed by the narrator. The intoxication and the conduct catalogued belong to the other person and are reported, not celebrated.

- R5(c): the narrator names harm without enacting it. The one dehumanising epithet applied to the other person is a figure for taking shelter in others without building one's own, which is the same claim the song's principle makes, so it serves the argument rather than undermining it. - R13: the profanity present is interjection, not aimed as a put-down. Strip test leaves nothing gradeable. - R16: applied. Naming what a relationship cost is not a payload. - R3: divine vocabulary is interjection and idiom, activating nothing. - Violet 12 was tested. The principle does give language to a common and unnamed pattern, and it is stated in universal address. It is held to the Elevated band because the dominant arc is one personal history and the universal line is stated inside it rather than as the song's object.

No Degraded or Corrupted tenet reaches grading weight. Degraded 9 was tested against the epithet and rejected under R5(c): it is a conclusion drawn from conduct the song has already established, and it carries the argument rather than diminishing for its own sake. Harm: 0. Pervasiveness: none.

- Blue 9: fires at full weight. A perspective earned through the struggle described, stated as a general rule rather than a private complaint. - Blue 3: fires. Acceptance of the loss, including the small mercy identified in the refrain. - Blue 8: fires. The narrator examines her own susceptibility at the opening rather than assigning the whole account outward. - Blue 7: fires partially. Held inside the Elevated band by the counterfactual refrain and by a scope that remains one personal history. Transcendence: 40.

Precedents: +30, +55 Stronger than +30, which rests on encouragement delivered to a single addressee; this song delivers a transferable principle in universal address and asserts a standard of its own. Well below +55, whose archetype is collective witness undertaken on behalf of an identifiable group as the object; here the object is one relationship and the universal line sits inside that account. Center: +36

- Saturation: 0. Governing content in the refrains and later verses; the first two are catalogue. - Resolution: -1. Closing verse ends on an oblique image rather than landing the acceptance. - Register: +1. The governing principle is a genuinely new formulation. - Reach: +1. Universal address in the principle widens it past the strictly personal.

harm settled at none, no discrete artifact. Contamination: none

prayer, a divine interjection, and an afterlife idiom all appear as cross-traditional vocabulary or figure. No framework is proclaimed or asserted as normative and the swap test leaves the message whole. Dogma: none

the title is a real person's proper name, so it is kept OUT of both prose lanes under the citation rules rather than named once for search visibility. Oblique reference used instead.

Elevated territory, between +30 and +55, because the dominant arc converts a personal accounting into a stated principle about where belonging belongs.

Reconciliation: aligned

Elevated territory, between +30 and +55, because the dominant arc converts a personal accounting into a stated principle about where belonging belongs.