No artist knowledge applied. Read as an unsigned lyric from an unknown writer. Every personal name in the song is treated as an unidentified individual and is not reproduced here, per the citation rules.

Visceral: -95. Killings recounted as accomplishment.

A first-person account of shootings. The narrator opens by telling federal agents the words are only lyrics, then catalogues drive-bys, a killing carried out because the target associated with someone, a body stood over, and a roster of named individuals shot, jailed, or dead. The outro mocks a survivor for the number of rounds taken.

Route: negative_payload. The violence is the content, carried by the chorus, which repeats in full. R5(a) applies: the narrator is the actor throughout, not an observer and not a witness, so every harm tenet fires at full weight.

Corrupted 3 fires across the whole song, with shootings presented as ordinary business and as the working solution to a dispute. Corrupted 4 fires on the contempt aimed at named individuals, including a taunt at one survivor asking how he failed to die. Corrupted 8 fires on the stripping of dignity from the dead and wounded, who appear as entries in a ledger. Corrupted 10 fires on the closing stance, an outro that mocks a target for the number of times he was shot. R13 applies to one line where a disability slur is deployed at a named target as a put-down, which grades as contempt rather than register. The opening disclaimer to federal agents is a deflection frame, not a retraction, and the eight chorus lines that follow it recount the acts directly; it is non-redemptive. Removal test: nothing coherent remains without the shootings. Harm: -93. Pervasiveness: pervasive.

Nothing registers. There is no grief processed, no accountability, no witness posture, and no critique. A brief mention of being lost for half an hour after a friend was shot resolves immediately into retaliation. Transcendence: 0.

Precedents: -92, -97. Stronger than -92 in one respect, since these are completed killings recounted as accomplishment rather than threats delivered as provocation, and the deflection here (a disclaimer to law enforcement) is the archetype's non-redemptive deflection exactly. Weaker than -97, which requires the extermination of a person or group asserted as deserved or necessary, with no performance frame at all; this song aims at a roster of rivals inside a running local conflict and keeps its disclaimer. Sits between the two, nearer -92. Center: -93.

- Saturation: +1. Harm tenets fire in nearly every line. - Resolution: +1. The outro commits to the stance decisively. - Register: -1. Coded vocabulary and name-listing, derivative. - Reach: -1. A local roster rather than a category of people.

Contamination: none. The read lands in red, where contamination cannot apply, and the payload governs rather than riding a higher arc.

Corrupted territory, between -92 and -97 and nearer -92, because the dominant arc is first-person lethal violence recounted as accomplishment with contempt for the people it names.

Reconciliation: aligned.

Corrupted territory, between -92 and -97 and nearer -92, because the dominant arc is first-person lethal violence recounted as accomplishment with contempt for the people it names.