performed. No performer identity, catalogue, reception or era prestige entered the placement, and this sheet required the discipline explicitly: the addressee is named repeatedly by a proper name belonging to a real person. Per the citation rules that name is never reproduced here and appears only as [the addressee]; per R6 the name carries no evidential weight, and the sheet is read as an address to a woman the speaker wants. Written at structural altitude throughout per the standing lyrics-out-of-output discipline.

Visceral: -2. Warm, frankly physical.

Concept: A frank declaration of physical wanting addressed to a named woman, asking whether the attraction runs both ways and arriving at affection.

A courtship address in two registers. Spoken sections name the addressee and ask for permission to be close, put the question of whether she wants the same, list what the speaker wants to do in affectionate terms, offer a boast about what he brings, and promise something beyond the physical. Sung sections report a warm sensation in her presence, state plainly that the attraction is mainly bodily, describe lying beside her as the preferred place to be, and land on a repeated statement of feeling that resolves into a declaration of love. Posture: wanting her and asking whether it is mutual -> wanting her and naming it love.

honoured. No verbatim reproduction and no close line-level paraphrase anywhere in this file; the addressee's real name is redacted per the rules; findings are stated as the lyrical MOVE at structural altitude, per the copyright-filter discipline in the backfill process SOP. Rung-2 abstraction from the first attempt: the sheet repeats its sections whole and the closing quarter is one couplet chanted.

Route: static_portrait The sheet holds one posture from first line to last, a want stated and restated, with no change in the speaker. internal_work does not open, nothing of his own being examined. encouragement declines: the address states his own wanting and asks after hers, naming no dignity or capacity in her. witness_critique, collective_stance and doctrinal do not open. negative_payload was the live alternative and DECLINES, which is the consequential call. R16 sets the test: name and quote the harm-signal. What can be pointed at is coded phrasing for sex carried by the spoken hook and one boast about what the speaker brings. What cannot be pointed at is any of the payload the route requires: no part of her is inventoried or rated, no roster or tally appears, nothing material is offered as a reason to choose him, no intoxication is celebrated, and nobody is diminished. The sheet asks her whether she wants the same thing, which is the opposite of the conquest frame the -75 and -83 archetypes run on.

Ego axis. Orange-08 fires SOFT: the recurring spoken line asks to have her in a coded sexual formula, and repetition puts the physical use of the encounter at the centre of the address. Three things hold it soft: the consent question is put directly and early, the list of wants is affectionate rather than anatomical, and the sung sections report her effect on him rather than cataloguing her. Orange-05 fires SOFT once, on the boast that he is the one who can keep her warm, which centres his own supply inside a request. Orange-01 declines: nothing material is offered. Orange-02 declines: permission is asked throughout, and no control is exercised. R1 covers the intensity of the wanting as ordinary courtship vocabulary. Pervasiveness is DISCRETE: the coded formula belongs to the spoken sections, and removing them leaves the sung material, which states attraction, preference and affection in plain terms and is a coherent song on its own. Ego: -12. Pervasiveness: discrete. Transcendence axis. No blue tenet fires. Green-03 carries the sheet with green-01 alongside it: relationship sentiment at face value and a feeling named without being developed. The candour about the attraction being mainly bodily is honest reporting and does no internal work. Transcendence: 6.

Both axes sit in the Decent band, so both neighbour lists run. Orange (ego neighbour): orange-01 does not fire -- nothing material offered as a reason to choose him. orange-02 does not fire -- permission is asked; nothing is controlled. orange-03 does not fire -- no pain on the page to wallow in. orange-04 does not fire -- no numbing, bypass or escape offered. orange-05 FIRES, soft -- one boast centring what the speaker supplies. orange-06 does not fire -- no self-destructive behaviour framed as strength. orange-07 does not fire -- no blame aimed at anyone. orange-08 FIRES, soft -- a coded sexual formula carried by the spoken hook. orange-09 does not fire -- no us-versus-them framing. orange-10 does not fire -- no insecurity cultivated as identity. orange-11 does not fire -- no scarcity or limitation as worldview. Two fire and both fire soft, which keeps the read inside the Decent band: the consent question, the affectionate list and the closing declaration are all on the page. Blue (transcendence neighbour): blue-01 does not fire -- nothing of his own questioned. blue-02 does not fire -- nothing owned, no consequence faced. blue-03 does not fire -- no hard truth on the page. blue-04 does not fire -- opening and closing postures match. blue-05 does not fire -- no growth demonstrated. blue-06 does not fire -- the wanting is performed, not exposed at a cost. blue-07 does not fire -- no problem he names a role of his own in. blue-08 does not fire -- no self-examination anywhere. blue-09 does not fire -- no perspective earned through anything described. blue-10 does not fire -- nothing released. blue-11 does not fire -- her answer is invited without empathy enacted. Adjacent tier: orange and blue enumerated, 2 fire

The governing axis is the ego axis, which carries the dominant arc at its own soft level; the transcendence read is small and does not govern. Anchors chosen by kind: an address whose down-signal is a stance toward wanting rather than an act against a person.

-28. Its governing condition fits in kind: flirtation centring the physical through coded phrasing, without malice and without possession, which is the exact shape of the spoken sections. This song reads WEAKER than the entry on two counts: the archetype centres a partner's body, where no part of her is described or rated anywhere here, and the consent question and the closing declaration of love are content the archetype has no equivalent of. The placement sits between zero and -28, much nearer zero.

-48-appraisal. Its condition requires a wealth or status display stacked on the courtship, and nothing material is offered on this sheet.

-65 and -75. Nobody is diminished, controlled or held down, and no roster of interchangeable partners appears.

-24. Its condition is a static unprocessed wallow, and the register here is forward and warm.

+25-gratitude and +12. The ego axis governs, and neither a tribute nor an in-group claim is on the page. Precedents: -28 Center: -4

relative to the placement, pole-agnostic. - Saturation: +1. The want occupies every section of the sheet. - Resolution: -1. The close is one couplet chanted to fade. - Register: -1. Standard courtship and desire vocabulary. - Reach: 0. One pair's scale, matching the placement.

Run independent of the placement. The ego axis GOVERNS this read, so the discrete-artifact case does not arise: contamination is the flag for a harm artifact sitting on a read the ego axis does not govern. Scanned in any case for substance promotion, ego-flex or materialism, casual cruelty, contempt, betrayal or infidelity, and none is present. R5(d) has no epithet to govern. Contamination: none

pure positive description. Subject (a declaration), stance (frank physical wanting), relational frame (a named woman addressed directly), and the moves (asking whether it is mutual, arriving at affection). No negation, no lack, no verdict.

self-contained and order-independent. It names one idea, desire stated openly to its object, and no clause sets one part of the work against another.

"physical wanting" from the sung admission that the attraction is mainly bodily; "a named woman" from the repeated address by name; "runs both ways" from the question about whether she wants the same; "arriving at affection" from the closing couplet. Every concrete noun sources to a line, and the name itself is redacted here. Summary check: clean

Decent territory, weaker than -28 and much nearer zero, because the dominant arc is an openly stated attraction that asks its object whether she wants the same and closes by naming the feeling love.

Reconciliation: aligned { "visceral_charge": -2, "route": "static_portrait", "harm": {"value": -12, "pervasive": false}, "transcendence": {"value": 6}, "precedent_refs": ["-28"], "center": -4, "vernier": {"sat": 1, "res": -1, "reg": -1, "reach": 0}, "contaminated": false, "contamination_note": null, "dogma_referenced": false, "dogma_note": null, "charge_summary": "A frank declaration of physical wanting addressed to a named woman, asking whether the attraction runs both ways and arriving at affection.", "confidence": 0.88 }

Decent territory, weaker than -28 and much nearer zero, because the dominant arc