performed. No performer identity, catalogue, reception or era prestige entered the placement. Written at structural altitude throughout per the standing lyrics-out-of-output discipline: routes, tenet ids, rule outcomes and values only.

Visceral: +10. Yearning, plain.

Concept: A man declares a love he has so far kept to himself, imagined in private, and asks the person he wants how to win her.

A declaration addressed to someone the narrator has known mostly in his own imagining, opening with a report of how often he has pictured her and how he sees her pass, moving into a plain statement of what he feels and an assertion that he reads the same feeling in her expression. The later sections replace that assertion with open questions about her circumstances and an admission that he has no idea how to reach her, closing on the declaration itself as the only move he is sure of. Posture: holding an unspoken attachment and picturing its object -> stating the attachment openly and asking her how to reach her.

honoured. No verbatim reproduction and no close line-level paraphrase anywhere in this file; findings are stated as the lyrical MOVE at structural altitude, per the copyright-filter discipline in the backfill process SOP. Rung-2 abstraction from the first attempt.

Route: static_portrait The sheet is a portrait of one condition, an attachment held at a distance, and the narrator occupies it from the first line to the last. internal_work does not open: he examines nothing of his own, and the admission that he lacks a method is a statement of his position rather than an examination of it. encouragement (R11) declines: the second-person address delivers his own feeling and a question about hers, naming no dignity, strength or capacity in her. witness_critique, collective_stance and doctrinal do not open. negative_payload declines under R16: longing, admiration and a want for someone's company are none of the harm-signals that route requires, and nothing quotable supplies one. THE LINE (static_portrait): the ratification test asks whether the stasis is claimed as identity, as home, design or kingdom. It is not; the distance is stated as a problem the narrator wants a way out of, and he asks for one.

Ego axis. This is the consequential call on the sheet and it comes back at zero. R12 governs it directly. The narrator reports private imagining and passive noticing of someone who goes by, which a contemporary frame would read as fixation; the rule bars importing that frame and sets a literal test, which asks for watching, following, tracking, threatening, asserting ownership over someone present, or keeping-from-leaving. None appears: he does not follow her, does not claim her, does not track her movements, and states plainly that he does not know where she is or what she does. R4 therefore stays shut. Orange-02 declines: no control is exercised or proposed, the closing move being a request for instruction. Orange-08 declines: she is addressed as a person with a life of her own, and the sheet asks after her circumstances rather than inventorying her. Orange-10 declines: the wanting is stated, never cultivated as identity. R1 covers the intensity of the declaration as ordinary love-song vocabulary. Ego: 0. Pervasiveness: none. Transcendence axis. Blue-06 fires weakly: the narrator exposes a position that costs him standing, admitting he has no idea how to reach her, and the admission is undecorated. Nothing else in blue fires. Green-03 carries the sheet, with green-01 and green-04 alongside it: relationship sentiment at face value, a feeling named, an atmosphere sustained around one figure. Transcendence: 12.

Both axes sit in the Decent band, so both neighbour lists run. Blue (transcendence neighbour): blue-01 does not fire -- no assumption of his own questioned. blue-02 does not fire -- nothing owned, no consequence faced. blue-03 does not fire -- no hard truth accepted; the question stays open. blue-04 does not fire -- the attachment is the same at both ends. blue-05 does not fire -- no growth demonstrated. blue-06 FIRES, weakly -- he admits having no method, at a cost to his standing. blue-07 does not fire -- no problem he names a role of his own in. blue-08 does not fire -- the looking is toward her. blue-09 does not fire -- no perspective earned through anything described. blue-10 does not fire -- nothing released; the wanting is stated and kept. blue-11 does not fire -- her circumstances are asked after without empathy enacted. Orange (ego neighbour): orange-01 does not fire -- no wealth, status or possession as a measure of worth. orange-02 does not fire -- no control exercised; instruction is requested. orange-03 does not fire -- no wallow; the register is warm and forward. orange-04 does not fire -- no numbing, bypass or escape offered. orange-05 does not fire -- no superiority claimed; he places himself below her. orange-06 does not fire -- no self-destructive behaviour framed as strength. orange-07 does not fire -- no blame aimed at anyone. orange-08 does not fire -- she is credited with a life he knows nothing about. orange-09 does not fire -- no us-versus-them framing anywhere. orange-10 does not fire -- wanting stated, never worn as identity. orange-11 does not fire -- no scarcity or limitation as worldview. Adjacent tier: blue and orange enumerated, 1 fires

The governing axis is transcendence (ego reads 0, pervasiveness none). Anchors chosen by kind: an intimate address whose whole substance is one person's feeling for another, with R3 governing what the vocabulary alone would claim.

+12. Its governing condition fits in kind: a claim carrying the whole of a song's substance where the higher tenets stay unfired and R3 decides the remainder. This song reads WEAKER than the entry on scope and STRONGER on candour, and the two do not cancel: the +12 archetype at least gathers a collective, where this sheet holds one person's feeling, while the admission of having no method delivers something the archetype has no equivalent of. Net, it sits a little below the entry. The placement sits just below +12.

+25-gratitude. Its condition is detailed thanks for another's effect on the narrator, and this address seeks rather than thanks.

+30 and +28. Both are second-person routes delivering an affirmation to the listener, and R11 was ruled inapplicable above.

+38-reckoning. Its condition is an accounting carried to completion, and nothing is reckoned here.

-28, -42 and -45. The ego axis reads zero and the ratification test is clean. Precedents: +12 Center: +8

relative to the placement, pole-agnostic. - Saturation: +1. The one feeling occupies every section. - Resolution: +1. The close is a plain declaration, stated once and squarely. - Register: -1. Standard romantic vocabulary throughout. - Reach: -1. One person imagined privately, narrower than the placement.

Run independent of the placement. Scanned every line for a discrete Degraded or Corrupted artifact: substance promotion, objectification, ego-flex or materialism, casual cruelty, contempt, betrayal or infidelity. None is present. The private-imagining passage was tested against the objectification artifact and declines: it reports the narrator's own state and attributes a life and a will to her throughout. R5(d) has no epithet to govern. Contamination: none

pure positive description. Subject (a man), stance (declaring), relational frame (someone he wants and barely knows), and the moves (private imagining, asking for a way to her). No negation, no lack, no verdict.

self-contained and order-independent. It names one idea, a private attachment brought into the open, and no clause sets one part of the work against another.

"kept to himself" from the report of imagining her alone; "imagined in private" from the same passage; "declares" from the plain statement of feeling; "asks the person he wants how to win her" from the closing request for instruction. Every concrete noun sources to a line. Summary check: clean

Decent territory, just below +12, because the dominant arc is one person's feeling declared across a distance, with an admission of having no method as the only movement on the page.

Reconciliation: aligned { "visceral_charge": 10, "route": "static_portrait", "harm": {"value": 0, "pervasive": false}, "transcendence": {"value": 12}, "precedent_refs": ["+12"], "center": 8, "vernier": {"sat": 1, "res": 1, "reg": -1, "reach": -1}, "contaminated": false, "contamination_note": null, "dogma_referenced": false, "dogma_note": null, "charge_summary": "A man declares a love he has so far kept to himself, imagined in private, and asks the person he wants how to win her.", "confidence": 0.9 }

Decent territory, just below +12, because the dominant arc is one person's