performed. Both credited writers' reputations, catalogues, legal histories and public personas set to zero; nothing outside the page enters the score in either direction. CITATION RULE applied to every stored field: the lyrics name two luxury brands, a sports franchise, and carry a racial epithet used self-referentially plus several degrading epithets for women. None is reproduced here, in the summary, in the deadpan, or in either prose; all are referred to abstractly. Visceral: -70. Purchase and conquest, blunt.

A narrator courts a woman by listing what he can buy her (designer goods, late-night visits, a flight, jewelry) and by asserting his sexual capability as the thing that will change her life. The chorus reclassifies her public reserve as private availability that he alone has unlocked. The back half moves to explicit description of acts he directs, a phone full of other women who appear once his wealth is known, and epithets applied to them as a class.

negative_payload. The route's own instruction settles it: a sympathetic surface frame does not demote a payload that pervades the song. The affectionate register is real in places (praise of her, a note that she stayed through his mess, a claim that she never lies) and it is the surface, while the recurring structural claim across four chorus passes is that he possesses what she needs and has correctly identified her as secretly available. static_portrait was tested and rejected: this is not a self-portrait refusing motion, it is an active transaction proposed and then executed. witness_critique has no application; the narrator is the actor.

Red 1 fires at full weight in the back half, where the partner is reduced to a set of acts performed on instruction and posed for a photograph, with the body doing the work and the person absent from the description. Orange 1 fires across the entire first half and recurs in every chorus lead-in: designer labels, air travel, jewelry and stated wealth are offered as the reason she should want him, which is surface markers held up as the measure of worth. Orange 8 fires on the class of other women, who are named with a degrading epithet and characterized entirely by their responsiveness to money. Orange 2 fires at moderate weight, since the offer of goods against access is the courtship's whole mechanism. R13's strip test was run on the coarse language: removing the profanity leaves the reduction intact, so it grades. Tested and NOT fired: red 3 (no violence anywhere on the page), red 5 (no possession or control is asserted over her; she is courted, not kept), red 6 (no revenge), red 12 (no nihilism).

pervasive. The objectification is carried by the hook itself, which is the most repeated content in the song, and the removal test guts the work entirely.

No blue or violet tenet fires. The compliments are appraisals of her effect on him and of her willingness, and nothing is questioned, owned, released or examined. Transcendence: 0.

Governing axis is harm. Placed between -65 and -75. Deeper than -65 because that entry stops at diminishing and controlling others, where this one carries explicit act-description and applies a degrading class term to women generally. Held short of -75 because that entry's engine is a roster of interchangeable, disposable partners, and this page does the opposite at the decisive moment: the other women appear precisely so the narrator can state that he has chosen one, which keeps a single relational frame around the transaction. Well clear of -83, which requires objectification as the whole engine with no sympathetic frame; the courtship register here is genuine, however transactional its terms. Precedents: -65, -75. Center: -70.

- Saturation: +1. Payload occupies the hook and both verses, wall to wall. - Resolution: -1. Ends on chorus repetition, nothing escalates or completes. - Register: +1. Blunt and explicit where the placement is coded. - Reach: -1. One bedroom, no scope past the transaction.

Run independently of the placement. The harm axis is pervasive and governs, so the song calibrates at the payload's level and cannot carry the flag; orange reads are excluded from contamination in any event. Scanned for a discrete artifact separable from the arc and found none, since the objectification is the arc. R5(d) was applied to the racial epithet: it is used self-referentially rather than aimed at a target, so it is not deployed contempt and does not bear on the flag. Contamination: none.

Degraded territory, between -65 and -75, because the dominant arc is a purchase of sexual access carried by the hook and executed in explicit terms, with a courtship register as its surface.

aligned.

Degraded territory, between -65 and -75, because the dominant arc is a purchase of sexual access carried by the hook and executed in explicit terms, with a courtship register as its surface.