artists set to zero; reading the page only. Lyrics are Spanish; reading the meaning directly. Proper names in the lyrics redacted per citation rules. Visceral: -80. Possessive, objectifying, controlling.

A multi-artist "only you" remix whose devotional surface ("you're mine forever," "stop believing the rumors I'm with someone else") wraps a pervasive payload: explicit sexual desire for and objectification of the partner's body, possession and active surveillance of a present partner (tracking her phone, demanding her live location, vowing to never let her go), jealous gun-threats against any rival, drug references, and luxury flex. The devotion is hollow and self-contradicting (he polices her fidelity while bragging he could have anyone), so the controlling possession IS the love-frame, not a counterweight to it.

negative_payload. The harmful content is the dominant arc and recurs in the hook and nearly every verse; the sympathetic devotional frame does not demote a payload that pervades the song.

red-01 (explicit sexual objectification, body as prize, graphic bedroom dominance), red-05 (possession/control of a present partner: GPS, phone-checking, location-spying, "mine forever, never letting go"), red-03/red-06 (gun-violence threats against rivals; a kill-threat to her, walked back), red-02 (Percocets, the bottle), plus materialism flex. R4(b) governs: this is active control over a partner still present, not clinging-after-loss, so it is Corrupted, not distorted heartbreak; R12 does not save it because the surveillance is literal, not era-coded eternal vocabulary. Harm: -82. Pervasiveness: pervasive (hook-carried and saturated across verses).

none. The "devotion" is possessive control, not genuine elevated or universal love; no internal work. Transcendence: 0.

governing axis harm. Sits between -78 (first-person contempt + violence imagery, payload sets the tier) and -83 (explicit objectification as the engine; the stacked corrupted-lifestyle ceiling of objectification + substance + territorial threat at about -82). The stack here (explicit objectification + active surveillance-control + territorial gun-threat + substance) lands at that ceiling; it stops short of the -92 floor because the violence is jealousy-accent against rivals (and a walked-back threat), not graphic dehumanization delivered AS THE POINT. Precedents: -78, -83. Center: -81.

(relative to the placement, pole-agnostic) - Saturation: +1. Harm tenets fire across the hook and nearly every verse; very saturated. - Resolution: 0. The close relands in the same possessive-objectifying stance, consistent rather than escalating. - Register: -1. Genre-standard possessive/sexual tropes, derivative rather than new-language menace. - Reach: 0. Intimate one-partner focus, comparable to the placement.

the read is on the harm axis (red); red/orange cannot be contaminated. Contamination: none.

Corrupted territory, between -78 and -83 and at the stacked-lifestyle ceiling near -82, because the dominant arc fuses explicit objectification with active surveillance-control of a present partner and jealous gun-threats under a hollow devotional frame.

aligned (center -81 vs visceral -80).

Corrupted territory, between -78 and -83 and at the stacked-lifestyle ceiling near -82, because the dominant arc fuses explicit objectification with active surveillance-control of a present partner and jealous gun-threats under a hollow devotional frame.