performed. No performer identity, catalogue, reception or era prestige entered the placement. Written at structural altitude throughout per the standing lyrics-out-of-output discipline: routes, tenet ids, rule outcomes and values only.

Visceral: +12. Warm, settled, unhurried.

Concept: Two people call each other close, naming a shared attachment found after a long stretch of wanting one as the thing they intend to keep.

A reciprocal address between two speakers, each asking the other to close the remaining distance and to remain, with a retrospective frame supplying the reason (an earlier stretch spent wanting rather than having) and a stated lesson that an attachment of this kind is to be kept rather than allowed to lapse. The emotional direction is steady and warm from first line to last; the request is the engine and the reciprocity is the substance. Posture: asking the other to close the distance and stay -> asking the other to close the distance and stay.

honoured. No verbatim reproduction anywhere in this file; every finding below is stated as the lyrical MOVE at structural altitude, per the copyright-filter discipline in the backfill process SOP.

Route: static_portrait The case for height would have to rest on the narrator's own change, and the retrospective frame reports a realisation already complete before the first line, so internal_work was tested and set aside: the opening and closing postures are the same request. encouragement (R11) was tested and set aside, since the second-person address asks the addressee for proximity rather than naming a dignity or capacity inside them. collective_stance, witness_critique, doctrinal and negative_payload do not open: no systemic condition, no third-party harm described, no load-bearing framework, and no quotable harm-signal (R16).

Ego axis. No orange or red tenet fires. Orange-02 was the one to test, and R12 governs: the request that the other remain, and the statement that a return to the earlier state is unwanted, are era-standard romantic-eternal intensifiers, with no watching, following, monitoring, threatening or keeping-from-leaving anywhere on the page, so R4 does not engage. R1 covers the intensity of the devotion language as standard romance. R16 applies directly: no ego-flex, no appraisal of the other as a prize, no objectified body, no intoxication, no contempt; a want for company is not a payload. Ego: 0. Pervasiveness: none. Transcendence axis. Blue-09 fires weakly: a lesson about keeping an attachment rather than letting it lapse is stated as earned by the earlier stretch of wanting. Blue-11 fires weakly on the reciprocity, each speaker warm toward the other without curation. Nothing else in blue fires. Green-03 carries the bulk (1:1 relationship sentiment at face value), green-01 and green-04 alongside it. R7 caps at Decent for the static_portrait reading: the closing posture equals the opening one. Transcendence: 14.

Decent on BOTH axes, so both neighbour lists run. Blue (transcendence neighbour): blue-01 does not fire -- no assumption or behaviour of the narrator questioned. blue-02 does not fire -- no mistake owned, no consequence faced. blue-03 does not fire -- the hard truth accepted is not present; the frame is warm. blue-04 does not fire -- start and end postures match, no visible movement. blue-05 does not fire -- growth is asserted retrospectively, not demonstrated. blue-06 does not fire -- openness present, exposure of a costly kind absent. blue-07 does not fire -- no problem the narrator has a role in. blue-08 does not fire -- retrospection reports, it does not examine. blue-09 FIRES, weakly -- a keep-it lesson framed as learned from the earlier want. blue-10 does not fire -- nothing is released; the ask is for continuation. blue-11 FIRES, weakly -- mutual warmth offered plainly by both voices. Two fire, both weakly, and neither carries the song: the placement stays in the Decent band because the whole substance is the request and its reciprocity, with the lesson stated in one clause rather than worked through. Orange (ego neighbour): orange-01 does not fire -- no wealth, status or possession as a measure of worth. orange-02 does not fire -- R12: era-standard devotion, no control move on the page. orange-03 does not fire -- no wallow; the register is settled, not pained. orange-04 does not fire -- no numbing, no bypass, no escape offered. orange-05 does not fire -- neither voice claims superiority or desert. orange-06 does not fire -- no self-destructive behaviour anywhere. orange-07 does not fire -- no blame directed outward, no responsibility deflected. orange-08 does not fire -- the other is addressed as a person, not an accessory. orange-09 does not fire -- no us-versus-them framing of any kind. orange-10 does not fire -- no insecurity cultivated as identity. orange-11 does not fire -- no scarcity or limitation as worldview. Adjacent tier: blue and orange enumerated, 2 fire

The governing axis is transcendence (ego reads 0, pervasiveness none). Anchors chosen by kind: warm one-to-one positive address whose substance is what one person means to another.

+25-gratitude. Its governing condition fits in kind, an intimate positive address to another person where the transformation sits before the song rather than inside it, which is exactly the frame here. This song reads WEAKER than that entry: the gratitude route earns low-Elevated because thanks for a named effect is the whole of the song, where the substance here is a request for proximity with the appreciation carried in a single retrospective clause.

+12. Its substance level is the right calibration reference for a song whose collective vocabulary is a pair rather than a people; this song reads STRONGER, because the reciprocity and the stated keep-it lesson deliver more than a belonging-claim does. The placement sits between +12 and +25-gratitude, nearer the middle and closer to +25-gratitude than to +12.

+30, whose governing condition is a single addressee coaxed toward their own opening with the agency already theirs; the address here asks for the other's presence, so the entry cannot serve as an anchor.

+28 (R11 encouragement), route condition ruled inapplicable above.

+18-diagnosis and +37-stance, dissent-route entries with no systemic condition on the page.

+8, whose governing condition is a doctrinally positioned devotional; the dogma flag does not fire. Precedents: +25-gratitude, +12 Center: +16

relative to the placement, pole-agnostic. - Saturation: -1. Governing-axis tenets fire in two weak places only. - Resolution: +1. The closing repeats the request and the vow squarely. - Register: -1. Standard romantic vocabulary throughout. - Reach: 0. Intimate pair scale, matching the placement.

Scanned every line for a discrete Degraded or Corrupted artifact: substance promotion, objectification, ego-flex or materialism, casual cruelty, contempt, betrayal or infidelity. None present. R5(d) has nothing to govern; no epithet appears. Contamination: none

pure positive description. It states subject (two people), stance (calling each other close), relational frame (reciprocal), and the move (naming the attachment as one to keep). No negation, no lack, no verdict on whether the song works.

self-contained and order-independent. The sentence names one idea, a mutual attachment claimed and kept, and does not depend on the order the parts arrive in; no clause sets one part of the work against another.

"two people" from the reciprocal address structure; "call each other close" from the repeated request for proximity; "found after a long stretch of wanting one" from the retrospective opening; "intend to keep" from the stated keep-it lesson. Every concrete noun sources to a line. Summary check: clean

Decent territory, between +12 and +25-gratitude and nearer the latter, because the dominant arc is a reciprocal request for closeness carrying a single stated lesson about keeping an attachment, which is relationship sentiment delivered at face value with two blue tenets touched weakly rather than internal work carried out on the page.

Reconciliation: aligned { "visceral_charge": 12, "route": "static_portrait", "harm": {"value": 0, "pervasive": false}, "transcendence": {"value": 14}, "precedent_refs": ["+25-gratitude", "+12"], "center": 16, "vernier": {"sat": -1, "res": 1, "reg": -1, "reach": 0}, "contaminated": false, "contamination_note": null, "dogma_referenced": false, "dogma_note": null, "charge_summary": "Two people call each other close, naming a shared attachment found after a long stretch of wanting one as the thing they intend to keep.", "confidence": 0.92 }

Decent territory, between +12 and +25-gratitude and nearer the latter, because